Differences Between e.max Crowns and Other Types of Crowns:
Differences between zirconium, metal porcelain and emax crowns in terms of material, aesthetic appearance and preparation requirements.
Differences between zirconium, metal porcelain and emax crowns in terms of material, aesthetic appearance and preparation requirements.
Porcelain Fused to MetalCrowns: These crowns have a metal core covered with a layer of porcelain. While strong, the metal framework can sometimes be visible at the gum line, and the porcelain can chip off from the metal.
Zirconia Crowns: Made from zirconium dioxide, these crowns are extremely strong and can withstand wear and tear. However, they may not be as aesthetically pleasing as e.max crowns due to their lesser translucency.
e.max Crowns offer superior aesthetic qualities with excellent translucency that mimics the natural tooth, making them virtually indistinguishable from real teeth.
PFM and Zirconia Crowns often lack the same level of translucency and can appear more opaque, which might not deliver the same natural look.
e.max Crowns require minimal tooth preparation compared to other types of crowns, preserving more of the natural tooth structure.
PFM Crowns typically require more extensive tooth preparation to accommodate the metal and porcelain layers.
Zirconia Crowns also require significant tooth preparation due to their thickness.
e.max Crowns are ideal for both anterior and posterior teeth due to their strength and aesthetics.
PFM Crowns are often used for back teeth where the metal's strength is advantageous, and less emphasis is placed on appearance.
Zirconia Crowns are preferred for situations where maximum strength is required, such as for molars that endure the greatest chewing force.